Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Lars Wendler wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
> > >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > >>> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> > Lars Wendler wrote:
>> > > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
>> > >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Rams
On 18-06-2010 12:16, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arri
# Diego E. Pettenò (18 Jun 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Collides with FFmpeg, which is a dependency of it. Its
# functionality should now be part of the main package
# (officially since 0.6, but also in our previous
# snapshots). See bug #314985.
#
# Removal on 2010-08-17
media-video/ffprobe
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:29:01PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> 2010/6/8 José María
>
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> > > José María Alonso wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package:
> >
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Why? You are running a free and opensource operating system, what's
> wrong suggesting *other* free and opensource alternatives? You are just
> providing the user a choice, not to actually oblige him to install anything.
Some of us
folks,
we are desperately looking for a sci-mathematics/scilab dedicated
maintainer. none of us in the sci teams have the time for it.
i did some work for a major bump in the science overlay, but it depends
on many java packages, some of them in the java-experimental overlay.
it has also some bu
ACK
I will proceed with masking as soon as possible
Thanks
2010/6/18 José María
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:29:01PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > 2010/6/8 José María
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200
> > >
Hello.
As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone
in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago:
In #gentoo-infra people are talking about banging each others moms
right now. I was told this is normal in there. As I mentioned it's
Alec Warner posted on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:16:36 -0700 as excerpted:
> I don't find it unreasonable to implement a tool as Duncan suggested
> because it is not a judgement but a statement of fact. "The license for
> app/foo has changed from X to Y. You should review the changes
> accordingly by r
Brian Harring posted on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:56:19 -0700 as excerpted:
> We have license filtering already, meaning the pkg in question isn't
> even visible on a default portage install. This is equivalent to having
> a safety on the gun that is pkg merging. Your request is at best
> requesting a
On 06/18/10 05:43, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Hmm - thats interesting, I subconsciously read the two questions into
>> the one posted. I accept you point. Its something I am likely to
>> write myself without thinking about it too much too.
>
> Oh, this is a good one. Without introducing the prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-06-2010 02:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone
> in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago:
>
> In #gentoo-infra people are talking
On 19-06-2010 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 19-06-2010 02:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> Hello.
>
>> As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone
>> in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago:
>
>> In #gentoo-infra peopl
On 06/18/2010 09:25 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
In #gentoo-infra
#gentoo-infra is a private channel and you don't have to be in there. No
public community members/users are in there. The "tone" can be anything
that is acceptable to the normal inhabitants of said channel.
This topic is
> Now that's tone in Gentoo. Brilliant.
And you're ugly!
Hey, you're doing it yourself. You're using sarcasm (I assume you do,
otherwise the positive "Brilliant." doesn't fit in the context of "Oh
dear, these rude people said that!")
I think we need to remember to tolerate each other more - the
16 matches
Mail list logo
