Alec Warner posted on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:16:36 -0700 as excerpted: > I don't find it unreasonable to implement a tool as Duncan suggested > because it is not a judgement but a statement of fact. "The license for > app/foo has changed from X to Y. You should review the changes > accordingly by running <blah>"
Just noting that it wasn't me that made that suggestion, it was Dale. Credit where credit is due and all that. FWIW, I agree it'd be nice, but also think it sounds like it it could be more work than it's worth -- unless someone with the skills and the itch wants to scratch it, of course. (I hadn't replied to this thread previous to this. Not that I hadn't thought about it, but for a moment there, I was wondering if I had replied when half asleep (I don't drink so couldn't use /that/ excuse), thus no memory of it, and was wondering in alarm what else I might have said! So it was with some relief that I realized it was Dale's suggestion you were talking about, not mine. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
