Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-12-2009 22:16:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > gmane is f-ed up already irregardless of what we do. it eats cross-posted e- > mails for breakfast and doesnt tell anyone. > > as for archives.g.o, file a bug if it isnt handling threading within a list > properly. i dont really see how your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Versioning of Python scripts

2009-12-21 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 04:24:49PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > Distutils/Setuptools/Distribute modify shebangs of installed Python scripts, > so that they > contain path of Python interpreter with version included (e.g. > "#!/usr/bin/python3.2"). > This behavior has both

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the thread on -dev. Or you could just subs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Election for the Gentoo Council empty seat

2009-12-21 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/20/2009 01:04 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Flattered, but I decline. I don't agree with the way the Council works and don't have motivation to attempt to change it. Out of curiosity, would you care to elaborate? I don't have much of a political axe to grind so I guess I tend to stay out of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-12-2009 06:30:23 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: > On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to > > -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o > > would also have the original "January 2010 mee

[gentoo-dev] Anyone intrested in maintaining media-gfx/digikam?

2009-12-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
media-gfx/digikam is rotting outdated in tree with copies of *dozen* internal libraries, like *five* copies of sqlite, including sqlite-2. Anyone intrested in maintaining it & unbundling the libraries? -- Bundling internal copies of libraries, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206934 http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Election for the Gentoo Council empty seat

2009-12-21 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/21/2009 06:33 AM, Richard Freeman wrote: On 12/20/2009 01:04 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Flattered, but I decline. I don't agree with the way the Council works and don't have motivation to attempt to change it. Out of curiosity, would you care to elaborate? I don't have much of a political a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item for Paludis kdebuild-1 removal

2009-12-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:28:19 +0100 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Since kdebuild-1 is to be removed from PMS immediately, it's going > > to go from Paludis in the next release too. We need to warn users > > about this, since they'll no longer be able to uninstall kdebuild-1 > > packages they have

[gentoo-dev] openrc/baselayout2 stabilization update

2009-12-21 Thread William Hubbs
All, we are still working toward stabilizing openrc and baselayout-2. The current status is that all of the bugs which have anything to do with openrc/baselayout are assigned to the "baselayout" component in bugzilla. Also, there is a tracker bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/295613. It would be ve

[gentoo-dev] last rites: games-strategy/freelords

2009-12-21 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (21 Dec 2009) # Doesn't work anymore; the version in portage is no longer # supported by upstream and no newer version is yet available. # Planned removal on 20100120 games-strategy/freelords