On 20-12-2009 22:16:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > gmane is f-ed up already irregardless of what we do. it eats cross-posted e- > mails for breakfast and doesnt tell anyone. > > as for archives.g.o, file a bug if it isnt handling threading within a list > properly. i dont really see how your proposal here would break archives.g.o > anyways. someone sends an e-mail to both dev and dev-announce, it has the > same id. people respond and they all go to dev. either way, archives.g.o > should be seeing a sane thread on dev.
New devs are not announced to -dev, the mail is only sent to -dev-announce. The "January 2010 meeting date" mail was only sent to -dev-announce (and -council), not to -dev, hence replies (that have to go to -dev) are replies with the original mail missing. If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the thread on -dev. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
