Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
switch not used by default so that's ok.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
>> > place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
>>
>> This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
>> up. To avoid conflicting with the current profiles, I was plan
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
05 Jul 2007 15:17:36 -0700:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:10 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
>> Chris Gianelloniwolf31o2
>
> While I thank you for the nomination for next year's Gentoo Council, I
> have dec
Ryan Reich wrote:
>
> If there's interest in incorporating this, I wouldn't mind testing my
> idea. Once I get past the initial resistance to doing anything at
> all, it's probably two minutes' compilation time plus two more writing
> the config files to set up.
>
I think I should point out tha
Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course
> switch not used by default so that's ok.
If this mak
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
> > -mike
>
> About how many packages will break with the ne
Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
I see they got around to adding the -fno-
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
-DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now.
Any chance you could add a
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT="mirror".
Also, I failed to see s
Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2007 14:09 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm overlooking
# Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
# Masked for removal. bug #167379.
x11-themes/gdm-themes
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll
On Friday 06 July 2007, Steve Long wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in
> >> > place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely
> >>
> >> This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting
> >> up. To a
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 00:08:43 -0400:
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitel
On Friday 06 July 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to the
> 4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2 related.
done, cheers
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
>>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
>>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>>> in the next day or so
>> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn yo
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all import
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
> conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind
> enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
> of context / I'm ove
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> > so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
>
> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
> It's enough that loads of games kill no
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
>>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
>> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
>
> the same exact thing could be said for everything using `built_with_use`
This chec
On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Why 4.2.0 rather than 4
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 11:13:30 -0400:
>> Could you reopen bug #179744 (kdesvn amd64 -fPIC issue) and add it to
>> the 4.2 tracker? I didn't file it so can't, but it's definitely 4.2
>> related.
>
> done, cheers
Thanks.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:40:47PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> > On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> >>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
> >> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
> >
> > the same e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, u
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti:
> A grep '!!' /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc reveals the following:
>
> bootstrap - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used during
> original system bootstrapping [make stage2]
> build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
- From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use gli
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
> They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
> of the license.
No violation here: "[...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS
AGREEMENT, PRO
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key finge
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> static - !!do not set this during bootstrap!! Causes binaries to be
> statically linked instead of dynamically
i dont really think this is in the same category at all with the other flags
you mentioned here ... plus i'm not sure this is eve
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks ema
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
> > They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
> > of the license.
>
> No viol
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this?
--atj
--
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use
> glibc2.5 for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't
> been able to confirm with them.
We are old-school and don't hang around on IRC. We are very
responsive to bug
Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Michał Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
# Unsupported, use media-gfx/splashutils instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-gfx/bootsplash
We don't provide any kernels patched with bootsplash anymore and
media-gfx/bootsplash has no support for baselayout-2. media-gfx/splashutil
It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
shiny new license to break the tree as a full developer. He will
initially work for that othe
* José Luis Rivero (yoswink) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just rescued the xml we used the last year and update the current
> nominations. The list is in:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~yoswink/council-2007.xml
It has been moved to:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/voting-logs/council-2007-nomine
I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
with all video cards and last time I checked the whole framebuffer in
kernel is not actively maintained.
Alon.
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Michał Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jul 2007)
#
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the "verbose" mode (background pictures on system consoles) and
there is no way of
On 7/7/07, Michal Januszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:06:07AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I think we should have user space splash... As fbsplash does not work
splashutils is a _userspace_ splash. fbsplash isn't, but then it only
provides the "verbose" mode (bac
Le vendredi 06 juillet 2007 à 23:52 +0200, Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
> It's my pleasure to not introduce you to somebody you already knew for
> the good reason he is already a Gentoo developer. He is the German
> translator follow-up to be exact. However, Tobias obtained today a
> shiny new license
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Jul
2007 13:32:27 -0400:
> i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the
> testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth
FWIW, I've only a single package not compiling on 4.2.0 now, and you
alread
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting guidelines a month or so ago and didn't see
any
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> He will
> initially work for that other desktop environment, also known as KDE.
> So please, everybody, give a warm non-welcome to Tobias.
KDE? Boo!
How's that for a non-greeting? ;)
Just kidding. Congrats on completing your extra quizzes, Tobias!
signature.as
On 7/7/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
hesitated.
I reviewed the bug reporting guidel
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:34:39 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like
> adding a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
> circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
> hesitated
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
> -mike
Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
event or product.
BTW, the GCC 4.2 porting tra
Duncan wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like adding
> a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
> circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
> hesitated.
I don't think anyone can be opposed to a thank you. Ke
On Friday 06 July 2007, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> > in the next day or so
>
> Now that the futimens patch is in coreutils, i heartily endorse this
>
070707 Duncan wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed,
> I often feel like adding a thanks to the bug.
> However, while it may be polite in other circumstances,
> in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've hesitated.
> I'm wondering, what's the general opinion?
I try t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
>> On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>>> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
>>> They'll already have installed
the new util-linux package has merged the setarch binary. for the upgrade
path, i figure we do:
- drop sys-apps/setarch from profiles
- add sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.12 based on arch?()
- add !sys-apps/setarch to util-linux-2.13+
any input ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
56 matches
Mail list logo
