Samuli Suominen napsal(a): > Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to > conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT="fetch"? Would someone be kind > enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out > of context / I'm overlooking something. Now, it's RESTRICT="mirror". > > Also, I failed to see such ACCEPT button in their homepage.. but I see > one after starting it(!).
Why would you need RESTRICT=fetch for stuff that displays license on runtime and requires clicking on Accept there? You can as well remove the package altogether because the 'trial version' is not downloadable via their website, there's no license to click on and an attempt to download the 'update version' (whatever it is) goes like this: Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to use as an embedded player. Click OK. Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to use as an embedded player. Click OK. 426 Transfer aborted. Data connection closed. Click OK, get redirected to FTP site. Nothing happens. Follow the advice and click 'click here' link. Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to use as an embedded player. Click OK. Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to use as an embedded player. Click OK. 426 Transfer aborted. Data connection closed. Stare on a blank page until you fall asleep. Well done, Nero. :P -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
