Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

On Thursday 15 June 2006 07:57, Harald van Dijk wrote: > So games implies "managed by the games team" sometimes but > not always? Meaning if the maintainer is "games team + X", then "games > team" must be explicitly listed as a maintainer in metadata.xml ? > > If so, sorry, misunderstood you, and th

Re: herding (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? project sunrise as an almost-fork.)

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 23:50, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 17:04 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > > The gripe in this respect is that we have developers (who don't respond > > to emails, friendly or otherwise) that will dump packages into dev-perl, > > copy a metadata.xml from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:54, Dan Meltzer wrote: > According to the devmanual [1] > "A herd is a collection of developers who maintain a collection of > related packages" > > are you sure you are using the correct term? > > [1] > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/herds-and-projects/in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds suck, fix them

On Thursday 15 June 2006 08:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 15 June 2006 02:33, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > > We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd, > > with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the > > maintainers of all packages in the herd.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds suck, fix them

On Thursday 15 June 2006 12:34, Jakub Moc wrote: > Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > I don't know if this is a really unpopular viewpoint, but for a lot of > > stuff I maintain I put myself as maintainer and the herd I am acting as > > part of in herd. My intention there is to say primarily I am taking

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux World Expo

On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 10 July 2006 14:38, Joshua Jackson wrote: > > So who's planning on going? Basically I'd like to know who's planning > > on going. I'm still undecided about it honestly, and if I go it'd only > > be for a few days. Its also probab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:55:57 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | The dev manual is *wrong*. No, the devmanual reflects what's actually being done, rather than an impractical definition that was written years ago that no longer matches the development model. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail

[gentoo-dev] gtk's X use flag

Hello,Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild doesn't look like it's using it.thanks,Sérgio

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk's X use flag

Ser Gio wrote: > Hello, > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild doesn't > look like it's using it. > > thanks, > Sérgio Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://s

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk's X use flag

Jakub Moc wrote: > Ser Gio wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild doesn't >> look like it's using it. >> >> thanks, >> Sérgio > > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it. > > I hate it when this happens. I have an ebuild in

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk's X use flag

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:31:52PM -0700, Tuan Van wrote: > Jakub Moc wrote: > > Ser Gio wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild doesn't > >> look like it's using it. > >> > >> thanks, > >> Sérgio > > > > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and

[gentoo-dev]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Ser Gio wrote:> > Hello,> > > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild > > doesn't look like it's using it.> > > > thanks,> > Sérgio> > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.Ye

Re: [gentoo-dev]

Ser Gio wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200 > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >> Ser Gio wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild >> > doesn't look like it's using it. >> > >> > thanks, >> > Sérgio >> >> Be

Re: [gentoo-dev]

On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 01:02 +0100, Ser Gio wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200 > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ser Gio wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild > > > doesn't look like it's using it. > > > > > > thanks, >

Re: [gentoo-dev]

On Thursday 13 July 2006 20:13, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > Actually, as of 2.10, gtk+ CAN be built without X and using the > framebuffer, so you can build gtk+ apps against the framebuffer (using > them, is another story... although I hear GIMP works) so having it > there isn't necessarily useles

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe die by default and doins, doman, dodoc warn initially

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 20:26, Daniel Black wrote: > there is always, not for joe blow who just wants to use Gentoo, the implementation details of portage be damned -mike pgp52zW9PEvg6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe, doins, doman, dodoc die by default

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 18:12, John Myers wrote: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 14:36, Steve Dibb wrote: > > Well, it could happen while testing an ebuild. :) I'd be pretty ticked > > if I were testing Qt and I didn't realize they did change the doc files > > around before doing a test run. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making dobin, doexe, doins, doman, dodoc die by default

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:37, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > SpanKY complained that he cannot set a custom die message then. But this is > not needed here, since every do* command can be clearly identified by the > argument and the directory it will be installed to. except for the times where the do

[gentoo-dev] 'mad' vs 'mp3' USE flags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It seems to me that having both of these two flags can only cause confusion. I upgraded xine-lib yesterday and spent a very frustrating 2 hours trying to work out what had broken my Amarok MP3 playback. It turns out that having the 'mp3' USE flag set g