On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
> > Michael Sterrett wrote:
> >
> >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
> >
> >
> > wont this disable important regular checks also?
>
On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
> Michael Sterrett wrote:
>
>> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
>
>
> wont this disable important regular checks also?
The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for
maske
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
Michael Sterrett wrote:
> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
wont this disable important regular checks also?
foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont
catch a broken dep in bar.
IMHO it should do the -I check in addi
On 06/24/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
Does it make sense to have with ebuilds in the tree with unsatisfiable
dependencies? If so, should we distinguish between conditional and
unconditional dependencies? Note that if the dependencies
