On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > > Michael Sterrett <mr_bon...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > > > > wont this disable important regular checks also? > > The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for > masked "parent" packages. > > > foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont > > catch a broken dep in bar. > > No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we > want one like that. > > > IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and > > print warnings/errors. > > The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. ooops yes, thanks. I got confused and thought it was --without-mask... Alexis.
