On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 00:57 +0100, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
> > > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make t
On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
> > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision?
>
> Well, as someone who spends a lot of time wor
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
> Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision?
Well, as someone who spends a lot of time working on/with profiles, I
say go for it. Since these changes would on
Eric Polino wrote:
> Alright, well I appreciate all the thought and discussion that
> exploded about this problem. The pidgin team appreciates it. Though
> I'm sorry to say I'm not up to speed with all this Gentoo talk. I
> gather that when IUSE defaults come out, the ability to specify
> defaul
On 7/19/07, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
joshua jackson wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Petteri Rýty napsal(a):
>>> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
>>> implemented.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Petteri
>>
Alright, well I appreciate all the thought and discussion that
exploded about this problem. The pidgin team appreciates it. Though
I'm sorry to say I'm not up to speed with all this Gentoo talk. I
gather that when IUSE defaults come out, the ability to specify
default USE flags on a per package
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:08:20 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just start using IUSE defaults! There's no problem with doing it
> at once since it can be considered as a part of EAPI=0.
No, IUSE defaults are EAPI 1.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Desc
On 19/07/07, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, that is the state we're currently in with regards to our
> profiles and the tree. I know I would *love* to see us start using IUSE
> defaults as soon as possible in the tree.
So just start using IUSE de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2007-07-19 18:52:59 Chris Gianelloni napisał(a):
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:19 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Petteri Räty napsal(a):
> > > Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
> > > implemented.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pet
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:19 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Petteri Räty napsal(a):
> > Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
> > implemented.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Petteri
>
> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
> Plus, what vapier said, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
joshua jackson wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Petteri Rýty napsal(a):
>>> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
>>> implemented.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Petteri
>> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Petteri Räty napsal(a):
>> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
>> implemented.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Petteri
>
> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
> Plus, what vapier said,
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:19:11 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
>> Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to
>> profiles.
>
> What, it belongs in multiple ebuild fi
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:19:11 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
> Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to
> profiles.
What, it belongs in multiple ebuild files, rather than a single profile
file
Jakub Moc kirjoitti:
> Petteri Räty napsal(a):
>> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
>> implemented.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Petteri
>
> As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
> Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
> Or just do it via package.use in profiles until IUSE defaults are
> implemented.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
As noted before, they are implemented, just not allowed in the tree.
Plus, what vapier said, this info belongs to the ebuilds, not to profiles.
Wrt pidgin - seriously
Luca Barbato kirjoitti:
> Eric Polino wrote:
>> Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-im/pidgin
>> turned on by default. We often get people coming to #pidgin looking
>> for help as to why they can't get MSN or some other protocol working.
>> It most often is because they haven't
Eric Polino wrote:
> Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-im/pidgin
> turned on by default. We often get people coming to #pidgin looking
> for help as to why they can't get MSN or some other protocol working.
> It most often is because they haven't enabled the given protocol USE
On 7/19/07, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
another option could just be to enable the protocols in the ebuild by
default (or does that have to be done globally in profile?) and force users
to turn them off if they don't want them.
Yeah that would have to be done in the profile. We co
another option could just be to enable the protocols in the ebuild by
default (or does that have to be done globally in profile?) and force users
to turn them off if they don't want them.
On 7/19/07, Eric Polino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-i
20 matches
Mail list logo
