Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-09 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2012 08:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" > wrote: > >> Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny: >>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 >>> >>> René Neumann wrote: Hi al

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:39:38 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > > René Neumann wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:21:21 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > yet base.eclass supports arguments for base_src_install passed to > 'make install' > > and council voted against moving this to the PM > > so what ciaranm said is very true, people just refuse to let it > become useless Perhaps you sho

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-09 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/08/2012 11:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 René Neumann wrote: Hi all, I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. should each eclass make sure it imports and inc

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > A lot of (inheriting eclasses and) packages depend on features > provided by base.eclass (e.g., PATCHES), which are pretty neat and > which I would sorely miss. So I would certainly object to deprecating > base.eclass, unless its rele

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny: > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > > > René Neumann wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' > > > of base.e

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > René Neumann wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' > > > of base.ecl

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > René Neumann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. > > should each

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > René Neumann wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, > > i.e. should each

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió: > Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny: > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > René Neumann wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > >> base.eclass: Is this eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread René Neumann
Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > René Neumann wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of >> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. >> should each eclass make sure it

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 René Neumann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. > should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it > just an ecla

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > René Neumann wrote: >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of >> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. >> should each eclass make sure it imp

Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass

2012-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 René Neumann wrote: > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. > should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it > just an eclass like the ot