Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny: > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > René Neumann <li...@necoro.eu> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of >> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. >> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it >> just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they >> inherit it if needed? > > No. It is unmaintained, has serious design flaws and it simply should > not be used anywhere. At least in EAPI != [01]. >
Thanks for the clarification. As Mike already mentioned, one should probably change the ebuild description to reflect just that fact. (Because at the moment it just says the complete opposite.) - René
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
