Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

What a lazy guy that Alec is. Maybe the OSL will get a holiday gift ;) -A On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > Is it worth the Foundation dropping a few $ for that hardware to *get* > > transported to its r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > Is it worth the Foundation dropping a few $ for that hardware to *get* > transported to its rightful destination, or shall we wait a few more > years for something to happen!? :) The costs of shipping it was already approved, we're ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sunday, December 4, 2016 2:15:59 PM EST Alec Warner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson > > > > Flameeyes donated his tinderbox hardware, but it's still sitting at > > antarus's desk in Mountain View, waiting for him to ship it to OSUOSL > > (hopefully before it's even mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 04/12/16 22:15, Alec Warner wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects bei

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > > that I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:22:33 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > >> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > >>> Markos Chandras wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + >>> Markos Chandras wrote: >>> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/04/2016 12:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > >> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > >>> Patrice Clement wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 >>> Patrice Clement wrote: >>> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > Hi, eve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 04/12/16 14:03, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > I recall some discussion about tinderboxing suggesting that more > important than testing all possible use flag combinations, would be to > test: > > * all use flags disabled (some packages fail miserabily if you don't > enable at least one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:47 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: This is generally considered infeasible: I would not think such, j

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:10 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf is doin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 6:30:08 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > > "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > > > > Did any of the tinderboxes test all the various USE flag combinations or > > just the defaults? > > I'm sorry but you are going off-topic here. I'm trying to gather > information on any of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 + Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > > Patrice Clement wrote: > > > >> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > >>> Hi, everyone. > >>> > >>> I've heard multiple times about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:08:42 -0500 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 10:39 AM, james wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Then a stage-4 image could be made available so anyone can install gentoo cluster nodes quickly and a bit of ansible code to load the framework onto a ope

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:47 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> >> This is generally considered infeasible: >> > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run aroun

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: This is generally considered infeasible: I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package that would get its USE flags and re-emerge it a few times. If a package has 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 08:13 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being started by ind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:33:00 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > >> This is generally considered infeasible: > > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package > > that > > would get its USE flags and re-emerge it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 09:25 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> >> This is generally considered infeasible: > > I would not think such, just need a wrapper to run around each package that > would get its USE flags and re-emerge it a few times. If a package has 10 USE flags, and if each can be set on/of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:14:32 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. > > wrote: > > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hi, everyone. > >> > >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 9:08 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects >> that I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Friday, December 2, 2016 2:10:27 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. Did any of the tinderb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 > Patrice Clement wrote: > >> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : >>> Hi, everyone. >>> >>> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >>> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 Patrice Clement wrote: > Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > > that I've forgotte

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf is doing tin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:03:11 +0100 Magnus Granberg wrote: > fredag 2 december 2016 kl. 23:32:37 CET skrev Daniel Campbell: > > On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > >> Hi, everyone. > > >> > > >> I've heard multiple

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

fredag 2 december 2016 kl. 23:32:37 CET skrev Daniel Campbell: > On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > >> Hi, everyone. > >> > >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > >> started by individuals in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects >> that I've forgotten who was w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. Flameeyes donated his ti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf i