On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:27:02 +0100
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > "Steven J. Long" wrote:
> >
> > > The core system has to be a usable basis to build "everything"
> > > from.
> >
> > I do agree with this except for "shaky"; it is a nice goal to
> > purs
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "Steven J. Long" wrote:
>
> > The core system has to be a usable basis to build "everything" from.
>
> I do agree with this except for "shaky"; it is a nice goal to pursue...
>
> That still does not make us able to do it or make it a realistic goal.
Bu
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:34:58 +0100
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > Let's say that I were to develop a system with some other Gentoo
> > devs; that doesn't mean we are able to make everything in the tree
> > support that system, making it an usable tool for everything is
> > unrea
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:45 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 08:21 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> None-the-less, I do understand the problem of a gentoo project supporting
>> an option no devs on the project are actually interested in running.
>
> I do not. If that is the policy, then the project is d
On 08/08/2013 08:21 AM, Duncan wrote:
>
> None-the-less, I do understand the problem of a gentoo project supporting
> an option no devs on the project are actually interested in running.
I do not. If that is the policy, then the project is doing something wrong.
Am Donnerstag, 8. August 2013, 08:21:47 schrieb Duncan:
> ...
>
> [Those uninterested in gentoo/kde can stop reading here, as the rest of
> the post is a complaint about that project not taking the same position.]
>
> Gentoo/kde users would be so lucky!
>
> As a gentoo/kde-er, I *WISH* the gento
On 08/08/2013 01:21 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Alex Alexander posted on Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:51:38 +0300 as excerpted:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/07/2013 09:14 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:45 +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
>
>>>
