Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-04 Thread Luca Barbato
On 07/01/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I guess, you are mixing cross-compile support in multilib profiles and > cross-compile support with cross-toolchains, multilib-portage is for the > first one, while crossdev is for the second one. > > My suggestion does not support e.g. compiling for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:06:43 +0200 Thomas Sachau wrote: > The problem here is the following: How do you know before the > src_install phase, that a package has no ABI-specific content? You make every package that has ABI specific content explicitly say so, as metadata. -- Ciaran McCreesh sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-02 Thread Thomas Sachau
Matt Turner schrieb: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Matt Turner schrieb: >>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to >>> special-case packages that don't install binaries. >> >> I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:30:44 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > > Zac Medico schrieb: > >> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > >>> Matt Turner schrieb: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau > wrote: > > > > I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Zac Medico schrieb: >> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Matt Turner schrieb: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/01/2012 02:52 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Matt Turner schrieb: I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to special-case packages that don't install binaries. >>> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Zac Medico schrieb: >> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Matt Turner schrieb: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Matt Turner schrieb: >>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to >>> special-case packages that don't install binaries. >> >> I dont follow. Did you think about only having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Matt Turner schrieb: >> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to >> special-case packages that don't install binaries. > > I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for > certain cases? Right.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Zac Medico schrieb: > On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Matt Turner schrieb: >>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> >>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- >>> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Matt Turner schrieb: >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> >> >> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- >> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips. >> >>> If a package has de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Matt Turner schrieb: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Matt Turner schrieb: >>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> >>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- >>> packages and also because multilib is pretty importan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Matt Turner schrieb: >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> >> >> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- >> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips. >> >>> If a packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Luca Barbato schrieb: > On 06/29/2012 04:30 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > > It is interesting, still you need a way to define HOST dependencies > (stuff you need that has to be built on the host since you run it, e.g. > xcb python code generator), something to play properly with ld and > cross-vs-hos