On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Matt Turner schrieb: >>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to >>> special-case packages that don't install binaries. >> >> I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for >> certain cases? > > Right. It seems to me that not having the ABI flags for packages like > x11-proto/* would make more sense, but may be more work to implement.
It seems like this could easily be controlled by setting a PROPERTIES or RESTRICT value in the ebuild. Also, it might be useful to give the ebuild similar control over the abiwrapper flag via PROPERTIES or RESTRICT. -- Thanks, Zac
