> package wine-foo and wine-any (or whatever it is called) supports foo
> as well. "-any" itself is arbitrary. Do you have a suggestion for a
> better suffix?
Why don't leave that "any" package just "wine" as it was before?..
On 04/10/2017 02:17 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-04-10 at 13:52 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote:
>> On 04/10/2017 01:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> So, the whole idea is that you can install vanilla and e.g. staging
>>> side-by-side?
>>
>> That's 50% of it. The other 50% is that since Windows ap
On pon, 2017-04-10 at 13:52 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 01:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > So, the whole idea is that you can install vanilla and e.g. staging
> > side-by-side?
>
> That's 50% of it. The other 50% is that since Windows applications
> often are better supported in one v
On 04/10/2017 01:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> So, the whole idea is that you can install vanilla and e.g. staging
> side-by-side?
That's 50% of it. The other 50% is that since Windows applications
often are better supported in one version or another, you can also have
multiple versions installed
On czw, 2017-04-06 at 21:18 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote:
> Plan is to move the packages into the repo as masked shortly after final
> approval of the news item. At that point, any testers would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> The split is a little confusing for those new to the concept and there
> have
Posted
--
NP-Hardass
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
