> package wine-foo and wine-any (or whatever it is called) supports foo > as well. "-any" itself is arbitrary. Do you have a suggestion for a > better suffix?
Why don't leave that "any" package just "wine" as it was before?..
> package wine-foo and wine-any (or whatever it is called) supports foo > as well. "-any" itself is arbitrary. Do you have a suggestion for a > better suffix?
Why don't leave that "any" package just "wine" as it was before?..