On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:22:13 +0100
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> I can actually batch invalidate all of them. This will generate some
> further bug spam (I apologize), but can save your time dealing with
> the mess. Please let me know what's your preference.
The URL field is likely not filled o
On 1/12/13 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
Oops, today I've tried my _separate_ script to file stabilization bugs
based on a generated list of packages to support that workflow.
Now the bug is that the l
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
>> for January.
>>
>> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
>> same time I also received
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty :
>
> I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
>
> http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
>
> Sources are available here:
>
> https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
>
> Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
> infrastructure
On 13.1.2013 0.49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep the sta
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
> > Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> > for January.
> >
> > I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:49:52 -0800
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
> candidates for January.
>
# tomjbe
media-libs/hamlib-1.2.15.3
media-radio/tlf-1.1.5
media-radio/xastir-2.0.4
are good to go. I put stable requests in bugzi already.
> honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
> missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
> lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
> that I have to search through.
So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2013 01:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
> net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
>
> be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open
stabilization bugs for their packages.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization
> candidates for January.
cool
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at
> the same time I also received lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2013 05:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of
13.01.2013 02:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>Please review attached automatically generated stabilizatiocandidates
>for January.
>
>
# mpagano kernel-misc
sys-kernel/linux-docs-3.6.
I'll do this for the just committed version linux-docs-3.6.11. What I will do
for now on is change our stabiliza
On 14:49 Sat 12 Jan , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
I filed dev-python/paramiko-1
On 12 January 2013 22:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
>
> I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> keep
On 15/01/2013 20:05, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> > sys-libs/freeipmi-1.2.3-r1
> +0.5
I'd really prefer to see 1.2.2 or 1.2.3 stable first, given the history
with FreeIPMI, I don't aim for too many stable candidates...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeye
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 02:49:52PM -0800, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> # robbat2
> app-admin/diradm-2.9.7.1
+1
> # robbat2
> app-shells/localshell-1.3.4
+1
> # netmon
> dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
+0.5 looking for another vote
> # base-system
> sys-apps/irqbalance-1.0.5
+1
> # base-system
> sys-ap
13.01.2013 02:49, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> for January.
> # pinkbyte
> app-shells/ccsh-0.0.4-r3
> app-shells/rrs-1.70-r1
> dev-libs/jthread-1.3.1
Ok for them
> # netmon
> dev-libs/geoip-1.4.8-r2
Ok for it
And thank
20 matches
Mail list logo
