On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
> > Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
> > for January.
> > 
> > I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
> > same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
> > keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
> > 
> > I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
> > continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
> > for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
> > 
> > Paweł
> 
> Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info 
> for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few 
> software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30 
> days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned 
arches) 
> based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he 
> checks if there are no open bugs).
> 
> Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-)
> 
> Tom

Tom,

This is a better idea.  I also believe this one can be auto stablized after 30 
days. It's just kernel documentation.



-- 
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources
E-Mail     : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C  9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index

Reply via email to