Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-26 Thread Sam James
Eli Schwartz writes: > On 9/25/24 1:47 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> Hello >> >> > [...] >> To my knowledge, one big issue right now is a circular dep between >> glib->gobject-introspection->glib, which needs proper solving to move >> forward with things. Or at least look at reducing the glib requ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Zac Medico
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 3:46 PM James Le Cuirot wrote: > Yes, the glib/gobject-introspection conflict was my main test case. It was an > interesting one because it also involved some blockers. I pushed my half baked > idea up to GitHub in the hope that Zac or someone could maybe take it and > actu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 23:46 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 14:41 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > > > same package twice with different U

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 14:41 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > > same package twice with different USE flags in the same emerge process > > in order to solve cyclical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Yuan Liao (Leo3418)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 08:47:30PM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Hello > > > The state of GNOME in Gentoo could use a bunch of work and we don't > really have the developers currently to take care of it. > My own grandiose plans to be back and keep things in good order faced > sad reality (a bunc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > same package twice with different USE flags in the same emerge process > in order to solve cyclical USE flag dependencies, but it's not a > guarantee... I see it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 9/25/24 1:47 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Hello > > > The state of GNOME in Gentoo could use a bunch of work and we don't > really have the developers currently to take care of it. > My own grandiose plans to be back and keep things in good order faced > sad reality (a bunch of personal things)