Tiziano Müller wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
It gives an annoyance please reconsider.
Done that. Won't change. See my answer to dberkholz's message.
As long you keep a meta package, as you told in the reply I read just
now, seems a good plan in the end.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Me
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > I personally have no opinion about the -base and -server split, since
> > I do not know enough about it. But I am firmly against the -docs split
> > since the doc USE flag is for this use-cas
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> While the dump command can read clusters created by an older version it is
> still necessary to dump and reload your data on version bumps between major
> versions [...
Of course. I didn't question the dump and reload cycle. Just saying you have
* Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> While the dump command can read clusters created by an older version it is
> still necessary to dump and reload your data on version bumps between major
> versions as written in
That's the point where MVCC is needed, at least for critical
applicati
* Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > WRONG we aren't debian.
> This is why we decided not to split out headers, clients and contrib.
Actually, I'd like to see them all split out. But this sooner or
later requires the upstream (or an intermediate layer, like OSS-QM)
to support this -
