On 2018-10-04 18:05, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2018-09-29 11:42, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 2018-09-23 22:42, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Yes, I could add process timeouts. But small timeouts are going to
> > > break the occasional necessity of cloning big repos, and big timeouts
> > > are going to m
On 2018-09-29 11:42, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2018-09-23 22:42, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Yes, I could add process timeouts. But small timeouts are going to
> > break the occasional necessity of cloning big repos, and big timeouts
> > are going to make little difference when Mercurial starts hanging
On 2018-09-23 22:42, Michał Górny wrote:
> Yes, I could add process timeouts. But small timeouts are going to
> break the occasional necessity of cloning big repos, and big timeouts
> are going to make little difference when Mercurial starts hanging again.
>
> If someone really cares about this h
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 23:44 -0400, desultory wrote:
> On 09/27/18 10:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 01:50 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:59:46 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm against dumb timeouts. Good timeout = die if nothing happen
On 09/27/18 10:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 01:50 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:59:46 +0200
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> I'm against dumb timeouts. Good timeout = die if nothing happens for T.
>>> Bad timeout = die if process doesn't finish for T (yet i
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 01:50 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:59:46 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I'm against dumb timeouts. Good timeout = die if nothing happens for T.
> > Bad timeout = die if process doesn't finish for T (yet it may still be
> > doing something).
>
>
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:59:46 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm against dumb timeouts. Good timeout = die if nothing happens for T.
> Bad timeout = die if process doesn't finish for T (yet it may still be
> doing something).
Could you perhaps adjust it so that when the timeout limit is exceeded,
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 10:42 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> 2. Mercurial is buggy and maintaining support for those repos is PITA.
>
As a former Mercurial maintainer, I'm very skeptical of claims that
Mercurial is that buggy or generally less well-maintained than Git. Still,
reality is that Gentoo is
On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 18:46 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > I'd like to ask Gentoo repository owners to switch off Mercurial
> > and remove all Mercurial repositories from repositories.xml. There are
> > two reasons for
Michał Górny writes:
> If you noticed that Gentoo repository mirrors did not update for 10
> hours a few days ago -- Mercurial was the reason. It is very fragile,
> and if some server chokes during sync, it hangs the whole process until
> somebody (which means me) kills it. And it's not the fir
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'd like to ask Gentoo repository owners to switch off Mercurial
> and remove all Mercurial repositories from repositories.xml. There are
> two reasons for that:
>
> 1. Portage does not support syncing from Mercurial repos,
11 matches
Mail list logo
