Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 02/24/2014 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: > This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated > into systemd! > > In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, > just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds > There's

Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 24/02/14 19:48, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: > This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been > integrated into systemd!In case someone still wants to retain his > original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c > overlay. These ebuilds > > - still install

Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-24 Thread Alex Xu
On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: > This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into > systemd! > > In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just > use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds > > - still

AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-24 Thread Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C)
This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into systemd! In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds - still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to. - disable the crap