Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 02 April 2006 20:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: > or you can be the hero and fix the packages ehehe yeah I'll do when i'll have more time, like i did for binutils ;) By the way, that patch? :P -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD,

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 02 April 2006 14:04, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Thus my request to zmedico to have a per-package use.mask so that we can > mask the flag for the packages that can use only the sys-apps/acl > interface. or you can be the hero and fix the packages ;) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.or

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 13:41:25 -0400 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In your own words what benefit does this have over > kernel_linux? ( acl? ( sys-apps/acl )) It moves all of the platform-conditional voodoo into one place, which helps maintainability and will greatly reduce the work involv

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Alec Warner
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:26:27 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a > | non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. > | Since the packages needed for this differ bet

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 02 April 2006 19:41, Ned Ludd wrote: > Do they use the same API? Not all of them, although some API are common iirc. Most, but not all, of the packages has anyway fallback to the right API in the right system (it's the case of vim and bsdtar at least, and should be the same for kdelibs,

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:26:27 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a | non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. | Since the packages needed for this differ between platforms | (sys-apps/acl is

Re: [gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 18:26 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: > We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a > non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. > Since the packages needed for this differ between platforms > (sys-apps/acl is for linux only), i

[gentoo-dev] virtual/acl

2006-04-02 Thread Stephen Bennett
We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. Since the packages needed for this differ between platforms (sys-apps/acl is for linux only), if noone has any reasonable objections I will be adding a (new-styl