Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:26:27 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a > | non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. > | Since the packages needed for this differ between platforms > | (sys-apps/acl is for linux only), if noone has any reasonable > | objections I will be adding a (new-style) virtual/acl for these > | packages sometime in the next week or so. > > Good. This'll move the icky deps to one place rather than all over the > tree, at least. > > As an aside, and not directed at spb... Would be nice if in the future > this kind of discussion were done *before* packages start to be changed > in weird and wonderful ways. It's generally considered bad manners to > start screwing around with other people's packages without asking... > Plus there's the whole "learn from past mistakes" issue. >
Drop it. -Antarus -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
