On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> I have picked this message to reply to so I'm at the end of the thread.
>
> The plan is to create a separate package for the init scripts,
> tmpfiles-init-scripts. This package will also add the init scripts to
> the appropriate runlevels.
>
I have picked this message to reply to so I'm at the end of the thread.
The plan is to create a separate package for the init scripts,
tmpfiles-init-scripts. This package will also add the init scripts to
the appropriate runlevels.
The providers of virtual/tmpfiles are opentmpfiles or systemd.
T
On 17/11/16 03:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:07:32 -0500
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> OpenRC's init scripts all do that already, more or less. tmpfiles.d
>> *.conf files are not used for this purpose -- definitely not by
>> OpenRC, and most likely also not by upstream pac
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:07:32 -0500
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 17/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > The package does not depend on functionality provided by tmpfiles.d.
> > The package does depend on directory being created. Which was normally
> > done via keepdir.
> >
>
> Last I check
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> Realistically, software should ensure the directories it needs at
> runtime are created through their own code, but upstreams are lazy and
> so they don't bother because, hey, we can have this tmpfiles.d *.conf
> file to have the system
On 17/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:10:28 -0500
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> On 17/11/16 01:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:46:41 +0100
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:10:28 -0500
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 17/11/16 01:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:46:41 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
> >> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote
On 17/11/16 01:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:46:41 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
>> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:46:41 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
> > Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> > > On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
> > > >
On 17/11/16 12:22 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:02:25AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
>>> William Hubbs wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:46:41 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> > On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:02:25 -0500
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>> On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:02:25AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>> On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On 17/11/16 01:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > >> On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
On 16/11/16 09:19 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 16/11/16 06:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > [...]
> Th
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 06:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 16/11/16 06:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> >> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> >>>
>>
On 16/11/16 06:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I can make t
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles s
On 16/11/16 06:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it
>>> is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:09:59PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it
> > is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation.
> >
> > I'm not sure whether it is worth h
On 16/11/16 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I can make the service scripts call the systemd-tmpfiles service if it
> is available or if not call the opentmpfiles implementation.
>
> I'm not sure whether it is worth having a separate package for the
> service scripts in this case.
That would d
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>> opentmpfiles will be updated to install the service scripts whic
On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> opentmpfiles will be updated to install the service scripts which
>>> will be run when OpenRC boots a system. There is nothing for
>>> it
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > opentmpfiles will be updated to install the service scripts which
> > will be run when OpenRC boots a system. There is nothing for
> > it to do if systemd is used to boot the system.
>
On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:57:57AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 02:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 15/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:57:57AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/11/16 02:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> On 15/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14 -0500
> >>> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >>>
>
On 15/11/16 02:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14 -0500
>>> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>>
On 15/11/16 12:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> OpenRC itself doesn't inst
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14 -0500
>> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>>> On 15/11/16 12:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
OpenRC itself doesn't install any tmpfiles.d files, and my plan is to
m
On 15/11/16 02:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14 -0500
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> On 15/11/16 12:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> OpenRC itself doesn't install any tmpfiles.d files, and my plan is to
>>> make sure virtual/tmpfiles and opentmpfiles go stable at the same
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:57:14 -0500
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 15/11/16 12:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > OpenRC itself doesn't install any tmpfiles.d files, and my plan is to
> > make sure virtual/tmpfiles and opentmpfiles go stable at the same time
> > the new OpenRC does, along with at least
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:22:42 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:11:52PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I have been wo
On 15/11/16 12:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 05:56:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:49:22 -0600
>> "Dustin C. Hatch" wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-11-14 23:09, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
>>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:11:52PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
> >> OpenRC [1], and
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 05:56:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:49:22 -0600
> "Dustin C. Hatch" wrote:
>
> > On 2016-11-14 23:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I have been worki
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
>> OpenRC [1], and I believe the new package is about to enter the tree.
>>
>> OpenRC itself does
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:49:22 -0600
"Dustin C. Hatch" wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 23:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
> >> OpenRC [1], and I believe t
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 23:09, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
>> William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
>>> OpenRC [1], and I believe the new package
On 2016-11-14 23:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
>> OpenRC [1], and I believe the new package is about to enter the tree.
>>
>> OpenRC itself doesn't need this
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:23:10 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
> OpenRC [1], and I believe the new package is about to enter the tree.
>
> OpenRC itself doesn't need this package to boot since it doesn't use
> tmpfiles.d
Hi all,
I have been working on splitting the tmpfiles functionality out of
OpenRC [1], and I believe the new package is about to enter the tree.
OpenRC itself doesn't need this package to boot since it doesn't use
tmpfiles.d files, but other software does need it.
This brings up a couple of ques
43 matches
Mail list logo