On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:21:41 -0600 William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:04:11PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 16/11/16 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:14:02AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > >> On 16/11/16 10:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > >>> opentmpfiles will be updated to install the service scripts which > > >>> will be run when OpenRC boots a system. There is nothing for > > >>> it to do if systemd is used to boot the system. > > >>> > > >>> William > > >>> > > >> > > >> But there is something to do if openrc is used to boot the system and > > >> systemd is the package providing tmpfiles.d processing via the virtual. > > > > > > The providers (opentmpfiles and systemd) will not block each other, so > > > the only way this will happen is if you have openrc and systemd > > > installed then forcefully remove opentmpfiles. I think you would not > > > want to do that until you are ready to migrate to booting with systemd. > > > > > > William > > > > > > > I think I'm having a hard time getting across the issue here...: > > > > 1 - we will have a virtual/tmpfiles that will bring in EITHER systemd, > > or opentmpfiles. > > > > 2 - openrc will NOT depend on opentmpfiles (nor virtual/tmpfiles) > > > > 3 - Applications that install stuff into /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/ will > > need to depend on virtual/tmpfiles in order to make sure that the > > system has something installed that will process them at boot-time. > > Yes, this will be handled by an RDEPEND in the eclass. This is a wrong presumption. The eclass needs the virtual only for pkg_postinst(). While RDEPEND is how we solve this now, it will no longer be necessary in a future EAPI. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgp0NNAKI_MXb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
