Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-12 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:00 Thu 08 Aug , Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 08/08/2013 04:47 AM, hasufell wrote: > > I'd say let's push for it. I am willing to do a lot of testing. > > > Good plan. I hope I find some time to figure out a roadmap so we have > an idea what needs to be done - or someone else might just wan

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-07 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Robin H Johnson wrote: > You also asked about PMS, and I'm wondering if PMS specifies the > Manifest contents at all, and/or if it needs updates for > MetaManifest. PMS doesn't specify the Manifest format, but refers to GLEP 44, so probably this reference should be updat

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-07 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 08/08/2013 04:47 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 08/07/2013 09:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: >>> AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". >> No, I did post implementation patches for much of it back when the GLEPs >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:47:15PM +0200, hasufell wrote: > On 08/07/2013 09:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: > >> AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". > > No, I did post implementation patches for much of it ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-07 Thread hasufell
On 08/07/2013 09:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: >> AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". > No, I did post implementation patches for much of it back when the GLEPs > were in process. The overwhelming message from

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: > AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". No, I did post implementation patches for much of it back when the GLEPs were in process. The overwhelming message from other devs at the time was that it should happen at th

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-06 Thread Alex Xu
On 06/08/13 10:02 AM, hasufell wrote: > It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet, > although they are roughly 6-8 years old. > > What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM > implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking > progr

[gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61)

2013-08-06 Thread hasufell
It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet, although they are roughly 6-8 years old. What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking progress again? I am not criticizing the portage team