On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> So you think we need to restrict fetch so we can let the user know about
> the licensing thing?
No. If a user wants Gentoo to help them stay on top of their licenses
there is already a mechanism for this - ACCEPT_LICENSE. The spotify
"licen
On 11/06/2012 12:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>> One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I
>> don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That
>> sound acceptable?
>
> The last time I looked a
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I
> don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That
> sound acceptable?
The last time I looked at the ebuild that was already done. We have
no other ch
On 10/29/2012 09:17 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
> of licensing concerns.
>
> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
>
> 10:02 < prometheanfire > do you have a plaintext version? I can copy
> the text, but just tho
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
> of licensing concerns.
>
> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
That doesn't really look like a license to me. It seems to be more
like the terms of us
It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because
of licensing concerns.
http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/
10:02 < prometheanfire > do you have a plaintext version? I can copy
the text, but just thought I'd ask :D
10:02 < dan^spotify > No, and copy+past
