On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > So you think we need to restrict fetch so we can let the user know about > the licensing thing?
No. If a user wants Gentoo to help them stay on top of their licenses there is already a mechanism for this - ACCEPT_LICENSE. The spotify "license" in the tree would just contain a disclaimer and link like the one I proposed earlier, and it would not be part of the free license groups, etc. Besides, anybody using the spotify service will no doubt be exposed to the agreement as part of signing up for it. I would not look to strip any click-throughs upstream puts in their application, but neither would I make users jump through hoops. Fetch restriction generally should be used for packages that do not have stable URIs, which we also cannot mirror. Rich
