Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction SLIPUP

2018-08-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:36:37 +0100 Amy Liffey wrote: > Hello folks, > > I apologize to everyone for sending this proposal before it was > finished. It was not voted on by the QA team hence it was not an > official proposal by the QA team. There was probably some > misunderstanding in communicati

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction SLIPUP

2018-07-31 Thread Amy Liffey
Hello folks, I apologize to everyone for sending this proposal before it was finished. It was not voted on by the QA team hence it was not an official proposal by the QA team. There was probably some misunderstanding in communication. After we finish the official draft and it is accepted by QA te

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-30 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:52 AM Guilherme Amadio wrote: > If you introduce penalties for breaking prefix as well, I'm afraid many > people will be unnecessarily penalized. I think that such penalties are > counter productive in most cases. If someone is really being careless it > might make sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hello, I like the idea of enforcing quality rules in the tree, but I have a few reservations regarding the current plan. On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:47:47PM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote: > > > C

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 12:40:18AM +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > (e.g make major changes to the widely used eclasses without prior > discussion on the mailing list or What's the metric to say if a given eclass is widely used? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasur

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Gordon Pettey
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:47:47 +0900 Alice Ferrazzi wrote: >> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote: >> >> > Completely agreeing with Sergei, with some additional suggestions: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:47:47 +0900 Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote: > > > Completely agreeing with Sergei, with some additional suggestions: > > > > On 28-07-2018 23:14:12 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote: > Completely agreeing with Sergei, with some additional suggestions: > > On 28-07-2018 23:14:12 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 00:40:18 +0300 > > Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-29 Thread Fabian Groffen
Completely agreeing with Sergei, with some additional suggestions: On 28-07-2018 23:14:12 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 00:40:18 +0300 > Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > The Gentoo QA team would like to introduce the following policy that > > would be applied t

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-28 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 00:40:18 +0300 Mikle Kolyada wrote: > Hello, > > The Gentoo QA team would like to introduce the following policy that > would be applied to individuals breaking the state and quality of the > main gentoo.git tree > > ( as we do not have this strictly documented yet): > > >

[gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-28 Thread Mikle Kolyada
Hello, The Gentoo QA team would like to introduce the following policy that would be applied to individuals breaking the state and quality of the main gentoo.git tree ( as we do not have this strictly documented yet): If recommended Gentoo workflow policies are not followed by an individual de