Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default

2013-06-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > > Michael Sterrett wrote: > > > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > > > > wont this disable important regular checks also? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default

2013-06-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 > Michael Sterrett wrote: > >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. > > > wont this disable important regular checks also? The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for maske

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default

2013-06-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 Michael Sterrett wrote: > repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. wont this disable important regular checks also? foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont catch a broken dep in bar. IMHO it should do the -I check in addi

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default

2013-06-24 Thread Zac Medico
On 06/24/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote: > repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. Does it make sense to have with ebuilds in the tree with unsatisfiable dependencies? If so, should we distinguish between conditional and unconditional dependencies? Note that if the dependencies

[gentoo-dev] repoman default

2013-06-24 Thread Michael Sterrett
repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.