base.eclass: last-rite eclass (mark as @DEAD)
Removal on 2021-05-09. Please port to general eclass functions/helpers.
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/497022 for information.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 08:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
> wrote:
>
>> Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
>>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
>>>
>>> René Neumann wrote:
Hi al
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:39:38 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > > René Neumann wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:21:21 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> yet base.eclass supports arguments for base_src_install passed to
> 'make install'
>
> and council voted against moving this to the PM
>
> so what ciaranm said is very true, people just refuse to let it
> become useless
Perhaps you sho
On 07/08/2012 11:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and inc
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> A lot of (inheriting eclasses and) packages depend on features
> provided by base.eclass (e.g., PATCHES), which are pretty neat and
> which I would sorely miss. So I would certainly object to deprecating
> base.eclass, unless its rele
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> >
> > René Neumann wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status'
> > > of base.e
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > René Neumann wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status'
> > > of base.ecl
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
>
> René Neumann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> > should each
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere,
> > i.e. should each
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió:
> Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> > René Neumann wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> >> base.eclass: Is this eclass
Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
>> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
>> should each eclass make sure it
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
> just an ecla
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
> René Neumann wrote:
>> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
>> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
>> should each eclass make sure it imp
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
> just an eclass like the ot
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it
just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they inherit
it if ne
16 matches
Mail list logo
