On 08/28/14 19:23, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:57:11 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
scanelf is the last line of defense. If we get there, paxctl and
paxctl-ng have failed, so we can't trust them really. Changing the
exit code for scanelf could cause other issues, eg in porta
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:57:11 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> scanelf is the last line of defense. If we get there, paxctl and
> paxctl-ng have failed, so we can't trust them really. Changing the
> exit code for scanelf could cause other issues, eg in portage where
> it is used in a few plac
On 08/26/14 21:21, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2014 06:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2014 06:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
>> On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile
>> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
>>> peo
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a d
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
> people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
> Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a diff isn't as useful as
> just
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.
Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a diff isn't as useful as
just looking at the entire class.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo
