On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198.   Can 
> people please review that bug and the latest suggestion for the eclass.   
> Since I'm inverting some if and for blocks, a diff isn't as useful as 
> just looking at the entire class.
> 

What if scanelf will fail? Looks like pax-mark() will not report an error.

And there are unused variables in pax-mark(): pt_fail* and xt_fail*.

-- 
Alexander Tsoy

Reply via email to