Hi,
It is time for me to resign as a Gentoo developer. I no longer contribute
enough to the project to warrant developer status, and that is not likely to
change anytime soon. With new hobbies and projects in my life, I no longer
find the free time and motivation combination that used to make m
Good luck, dude.
--
Davide "dav_it" Italiano
Gentoo Gnu/Linux Developer
No, not from Gentoo.
After some thought, for personal reasons I resign from devrel. It's
been enjoyable, and all my best to the devrel team.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP s
On 17/04/07, Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:01:46 +0200
"Jakub Moc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:31:00 +0300
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:01:46 +0200
> "Jakub Moc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:01:46 +0200
"Jakub Moc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm sorry to see you go. I'm perso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
It was recently said that if you had been the
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:04 -0500, Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> > I'm therefore res
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:04:39AM -0500, Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> > I'm theref
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 07:43 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> > I'm therefore resigning from this project.
>
> While there are situation
Sad to see you go. In my pov you really did a good job.
I hope the ones in charge of bugzilla come with a solution to this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:28:21PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> > I'm therefore resigning f
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I would be grateful if somebody could refer me to the arch
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 06:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish!
I'm sad to see you go but I can't say that I don't understand you. It has been
great having you shove security bugs our way when needed.
Thank you for your work and best of luck with your future endeavours.
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish!
Sorry to see you go, man! You were one of the most hard working devs out
there.
Your contribution will not be forgotten.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17/04/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
While there are situations in which you are right about complaining, the
form of some of you
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since those
folks that contributed to my retirement far ou
I could see that kinda working IMO Caleb...a president-like figure to run things, elected id say would be best, maybe 1 year terms or something, cannot be overruled but elections can be called early if some overly high percentage of council/others express concerns about the person... otherwise thei
I agree. what we're seeing is a failure of democracy. at first it
works. then people have opinions. then bickering starts. and no one
has the power to stamp there foot down and say this is our direction.
It doesn't work very well. at the least we need a president like
figure. of course I'm not aga
On Saturday 07 October 2006 4:19 pm, Tim Yamin wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
> tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
> the ability to keep Gentoo a coherent and smooth environment has been
> eroded and hindered at pr
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Tim Yamin wrote:
Lately however, the "fun" and the motivation just hasn't been there
for the reasons I've outlined above; it's finally taken its toll, and
I believe the time to move onto new projects and ventures has finally
come for me.
I would like to wish all of you t
Tim Yamin wrote:
> So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Tim,
I'm very sad to see you leave Gentoo. All the best for your future
endeavors and do keep in touch.
Regards,
--
Shyam Mani | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
docs-team | http://gdp.gentoo.org
devrel | http://devrel.gentoo.org
GPG Key|
Seeing you go under these circumstances really worries me. Perhaps you
want to reconsider it - if not: All the best!
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo d
Tim Yamin wrote:
> Lately however, the "fun" and the motivation just hasn't been there
> for the reasons I've outlined above; it's finally taken its toll, and
> I believe the time to move onto new projects and ventures has finally
> come for me.
>
> I would like to wish all of you the very best, a
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:19:14PM +, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
> tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
>
Sorry to see you leave.
Good luck.
tomaw.
>
pgpsUI71BNcK3.pgp
D
Hi Tim,
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 23:19 schrieb Tim Yamin:
> I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
> tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
> the ability to keep Gentoo a coherent and smooth environment has been
> eroded and hindered at pra
Tim Yamin wrote:
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Tim.
Well, I've already given you my best wishes for the future, but it can't
hurt to do it twice :P
Have fun doing whatever it is you'll be doing with yourself
Take care,
Peter Weller
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2006.10.07 22:19, Tim Yamin wrote:
All,
[snip]
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Tim.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Tim,
I'm sorry to see you depart.
Good luck for the future, see you around on irc.
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Tim Yamin wrote:
I would like to wish all of you the very best, and would like to thank
all of you who have (and haven't) made my time here so enjoyable.
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
I can't say this was unexpected, but I'm sorry to see you go. Are you going to
continue to contribu
Hi Tim,
On 10/7/06, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to wish all of you the very best, and would like to thank
all of you who have (and haven't) made my time here so enjoyable.
All the very best with whatever you do next. It's been a real
pleasure working with you on Gentoo,
All,
I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
the ability to keep Gentoo a coherent and smooth environment has been
eroded and hindered at practically every opportunity by bad decisions,
staff, and in some
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:49:31AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 14:53, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Christian Andreetta wrote:
> > > Many users (and I'm both a dev *and* a user) just could do much for
> > > Gentoo, but when you're in
On Monday 31 July 2006 14:53, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Christian Andreetta wrote:
> > Many users (and I'm both a dev *and* a user) just could do much for
> > Gentoo, but when you're interested in a niche sector package, you *don't
> > have other choices* b
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Alex Tarkovsky wrote:
> http://www.gentoo-sunrise.org/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq#ButBugzillaisactuallyeasier
says:
"We do think that Sunrise is easier."
[..]
"But in contrast to that it requires more knowledge and tools to get
something into sunrise - more wo
On 8/2/06, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:27, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 04:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> And the patch
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 05:50, Richard Fish wrote:
> Nothing that I have read about sunrise, either in GWN, their project
> pages, or the FAQ, has given me the impression that they are "urging
> all users to give it a try". There is certainly some advertising
> about it, as would be appropriat
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:27, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 04:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> And the patch hanging in bugzilla forever because no-one wants to
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> I do not see why it is considdered hard for users to "get involved".
> Users have at least two choices that I can think of right now, and
> probably a number that I cannot think of.
>
> 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever freq
On 02/08/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> load up your
On 8/1/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And that's why it has been announced as the best since sliced bred - urging
all users to give it a try, but with the option to point with the finger on
them, laughing "Ha, ha, you should have known dumb nuts.", later. Brett is
absolutely right
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:01, Christian Andreetta wrote:
> Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> >> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to
> >> expect IF I use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official
> >>
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> load up your browser and check out how many bugs are assigned
> to '[E
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:53:00PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Brixy!! You can't leave. Who else will I ramble to on IRC after coming
> back from the bars? Who else will fix my wireless adapter?
You can still ramble to me on IRC - it's not like I'm dropping off the
face of the Earth. As for you
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> To my former fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>>
>> In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the Sunrise project is
>> no longer suspende
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:08:12 +0200 "Denis Dupeyron"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What if a well respected ebuild developper that supports the project
| volunteered to join it ?
Get a half dozen and I suspect a lot of the concern will be reduced
substantially...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail
On 7/31/06, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thirdly, I know one of the issues with one of the leaders of the
project, is the fact that they are not a ebuild developer. I'd like to
have them take the second quiz simply to prove that they have the
knowledge to be trusted to review the ebu
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Christian Andreetta wrote:
>
> Many users (and I'm both a dev *and* a user) just could do much for
> Gentoo, but when you're interested in a niche sector package, you *don't
> have other choices* but
>
> 1) an endless wait for an open bug
> 2) becoming de
On 2006.07.31 12:01, Giacomo Cariello wrote:
Roy Bamford wrote:
> Sunrise attempts to provide the next part of the school system
down. A school system should have a well defined syllabus, explicit
educational targets and an objective evaluation system. If Gentoo is
going to run a Gentoo School
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
>> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to expect IF
>> I
>> use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official people figure
>>
Roy Bamford wrote:
> Sunrise attempts to provide the next part of the school system down.
A school system should have a well defined syllabus, explicit
educational targets and an objective evaluation system. If Gentoo is
going to run a Gentoo School with courses for developers, that sounds
cool (an
On 2006.07.31 03:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:19:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| we take a risk with this project (like every single other
| project) ... if sunrise turns out to suck and cause problems, then
we
| kill it, no big deal
How many more users
Bryan A~stergaard wrote:
> That's my opinion anyway and from talking to brix about all this I
> believe his biggest reason for leaving have been the way Sunrise have
> been forced through despite the many complaints raised (and still not
> fixed).
>
> Regards,
> Bryan ?stergaard
Well, such as? T
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Bryan A~stergaard wrote:
> Well, huh??? Looks like you've missed the -dev ML thread altogether, as
> did brix (despite it was himself who started it, as Mike has already
> pointed out). Brix didn't write any proposal and didn't raise any
Bryan A~stergaard wrote:
> Left in a huff? I'm sorry but I don't think you fully understand the
> reasons for Brix leaving. After Sunrise was suspended by the council
> there was a meeting [1] between brix, the sunrise leads (genstef and
> jokey), christel (representing user relations), myself and
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:50:31PM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:35 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:19:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | we take a risk with this project (like every single other
> > | project) ... if sun
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:50:40 -0400
"Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Continue with *top-posting* as it is.
Does Gentoo gives more choises to users or not?
With the freedom/choise comes the responsibility (if anything breaks).
Gentoo is known not to be for *everybody* (unless he/she
On 7/30/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
| developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo develo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
> | developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
>
> Did you look at *whi
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:42:52 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| What, honestly, are people worried about with Sunrise?
Partly, the part where it's run by people who have little clue about
ebuild development or QA, who will be taking code from people who have
little clue about ebuil
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:36:36 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 05:27 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
|
| Is this sort of degeneration really necessary?
Considering how one of the major conce
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 05:27 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
Is this sort of degeneration really necessary?
> Even that aside, if a couple of hundred developers can't handle doing
> QA for all those maintainer-wanted ebuilds, what
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
| developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
Even that aside, if a couple of hu
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to expect IF
> I
> use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official people figure
> it's gentoo and when it breaks Gentoo suffers. Gentoo has a reputation as a
On 7/30/06, Brett I. Holcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My concerns - first for my systems - are that it is allowing essentially
anybody to
submit almost anything with no QA.
This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1]. Every
My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to expect IF I
use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official people figure
it's gentoo and when it breaks Gentoo suffers. Gentoo has a reputation as a
good solid, stable distro. As user and big fan of Gentoo I'm conc
On Sunday 30 July 2006 23:32, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> - first for my systems - are that it is allowing essentially anybody to
> submit almost anything with no QA.
no, read the FAQ
http://www.gentoo-sunrise.org/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq#Howareyouensuringthatthereisnob0rken/maliciuscodegettingintoth
OK wait, on your servers, are you actually planning to *use* any of the
ebuilds in Sunrise's overlay?
If not, how is it a concern? I personally don't use any of them, and my
system is running perfectly fine.
Let's not forget that nobody is shoving Sunrise down anyone's throat...
--
Seemant Ku
I am only a user and have been keeping out of this debate but I feel I need to
at least express my thoughts. I have been folllowing the Sunrise thread(s)
since it started. I have done a couple of ebuilds a long time ago and
would love to have been able to contribute to Gentoo but due to time
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 04:06 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:50:31 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Show me at least that concern being concrete and we have a
> | starting place.
>
> -!- [Users #gentoo-sunrise]
> -!- @genstef devon bonsaikitten_ Zamorate
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:50:31 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Show me at least that concern being concrete and we have a
| starting place.
-!- [Users #gentoo-sunrise]
-!- @genstef devon bonsaikitten_ Zamorate eimono|home dev-zero brebs
staskorz @nichoj_work eimono SunriseCIA rich
On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:19:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | we take a risk with this project (like every single other
> | project) ... if sunrise turns out to suck and cause problems, then we
> | kill it, no big deal
>
> How many
On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
load up your browser and check out how many bugs are assigned
to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
opening a bug, putting together an ebuild/pa
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:35 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:19:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | we take a risk with this project (like every single other
> | project) ... if sunrise turns out to suck and cause problems, then we
> | kill it, no big deal
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 22:28 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> I do not see why it is considdered hard for users to "get involved".
> Users have at least two choices that I can think of right now, and
> probably a number that I cannot think of.
What's wrong with adding a third? Furthermore, a third whe
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:19:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| we take a risk with this project (like every single other
| project) ... if sunrise turns out to suck and cause problems, then we
| kill it, no big deal
How many more users and developers will have to be lost before it'
On 7/30/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 18:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Personally I'd expect the council to block the thing permanently.
hard to address any sort of concerns here, so i guess i'll just regurgitate
the council log to you
it's hard for users t
On Sunday 30 July 2006 18:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Personally I'd expect the council to block the thing permanently.
hard to address any sort of concerns here, so i guess i'll just regurgitate
the council log to you
it's hard for users to get involved in our development process ... i imagine
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:51:09 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| then what else would you expect the Council to do ?
Personally I'd expect the council to block the thing permanently. The
council is, after all, supposed to serve as the last line of defence
against people pushing throu
On Friday 28 July 2006 06:02, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > Mike asked you repeatedly to voice your issues or concerns in relation
> > to Project Sunrise, which you failed to reply to.
>
> How many times are we supposed to raise
On Friday 28 July 2006 01:55, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> So long and thank you for all the fish,
> Brix
I really hate to return home from a long weekend to read these kind of emails.
I'm very sad to see you go, you really improved alot on the wireless experience!
Good luck with your future pro
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 12:02 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > Mike asked you repeatedly to voice your issues or concerns in relation
> > to Project Sunrise, which you failed to reply to.
>
> How many times are we supposed to
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> Mike asked you repeatedly to voice your issues or concerns in relation
> to Project Sunrise, which you failed to reply to.
How many times are we supposed to raise our concerns about a project
whose founders already agreed to run t
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:55 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> To my former fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
> >
> > In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the S
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:31:28PM -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> i'll miss you greatly, brix. You made my laptop and wireless (madwifi) worlds
> much much happier places. i'm on devaway, but when I'm back, if no one else
> has
> done it, i'll xmlify your pcmciautils doc -- you were the one who took
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> To my former fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>>
>> In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided th
To my former fellow Gentoo developers and users,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
>
> In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the Sunrise project is
> no longer suspended. I can give a short overview of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
Hey, Im gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As most are aware I was only active dev in mozilla herd. I have decided
that it is time to leave gentoo, which leaves herd unmaintained.
Security team can do as they wish, they do not take the user to mind
when they want to make hasty decision, without
Brian,
you'll be missed... can you at least pop by once and i while? always
enjoyed humping you...
/me 's list off biatchus is reducing...
good luck in the future mate, may you conquer your fears and reach your
dreams... don't forget "Ne humanus crede"
--
"Defer no time, delays have dangero
90 matches
Mail list logo
