Christoph Mende wrote:
> Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
> would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply "xfce.eclass"?
-Joe
Petteri Räty wrote:
> The names of eclasses aren't shown to users and I think figuring out a
> new name is a minor inconvenience so I would just go with the safe route.
I disagree: we should use care in choosing names, since these names will be
around for a long time. Using an ugly name might not
Zac Medico wrote:
> Christoph Mende wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
>> previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
>> for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
>> would be xfce4.eclass, ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Mende wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
> previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
> for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
> wou
Hi,
I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. It seems like
it was used f
