On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > > the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> > > request form the KDE team as well, lately.
> > >
> > welp's been away ;)
>
> welp does not touch K
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not
>>> enough devs...as always.
>> Well, I've offered my help with the amd64 team three times now. Was
>> ignored two times and the third time an initial discussi
"Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not
> > enough devs...as always.
> Well, I've offered my help with the amd64 team three times now. Was
> ignored two times and the third time an initial discussion lead to
> nowhere so I guess i
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> > request form the KDE team as well, lately.
> >
> welp's been away ;)
welp does not touch KDE packages...
V-Li
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http:
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 17
May 2007 10:59:36 -0700:
> We're taking a couple months off. We deserve it. There's no way we're
> making an August release. If you would have checked
> http://releng.gentoo.org before asking, you wouldn
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:38 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Now, how can we do this? Could we start changing the profiles right now?
> > (I guess people on ~arch will need to unmask it to not downgrade).
>
> That can be avoided if you make an artifical revbump that won't change
> anything, just
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:33 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark
> > it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1
> > profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark the packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark
>> it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1
>> profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark t
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> It's simple. You mask expat-2.0.0 on all the current profiles, we mark
> it stable in the snapshot and don't have it masked in the 2007.1
> profile. When we release (actually right before), we mark the package
> stable in the tree. We document the expat upgrade as part
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:48 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> >> No. It would have been ideal if we would have done it with the release.
> >> Now, it means people *will* need to use revdep-rebuild as soon as they
> >> install their shiny new system if they use binary packages. People
> >> coming from
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:57 +, Duncan wrote:
> "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
> on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400:
>
> > I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I
> > don't know what hackery has to take place to do
Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Hi,
> Might i sugest making an doc "expat-upgrade" and posting it in Docs (or
> some dev's space).
> This only for those who can't wait and want earlier upgrade.
> Even can participate in making it, if needed.
Three easy steps:
1) unmask it
2) revdep-rebuild
3) profit !
Reall
Duncan написа:
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400:
I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I
don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but I'm sure
someone out there does.
Wh
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Wed, 16 May 2007 13:48:35 -0400:
> I have no problem waiting for 2007.1, if Gnome and KDE don't mind. I
> don't know what hackery has to take place to do that, but I'm sure
> someone out there does.
What sort of ti
Steve Long napsal(a):
> welp's been away ;)
Oh well, the dreaded *buntu maintenance eats time, you know... *g*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> request form the KDE team as well, lately.
>
welp's been away ;)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> No. It would have been ideal if we would have done it with the release.
Exactly my point. Let's do it for the next release if neither Gnome nor
KDE folks can predict our/their next releases.
Cheers,
Rémi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>> No. It would have been ideal if we would have done it with the release.
>> Now, it means people *will* need to use revdep-rebuild as soon as they
>> install their shiny new system if they use binary packages. People
>> coming from stage3 would be fine, of course.
>>
>
I would have been happy
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
>
> No. It would have been ideal if we would have done it with the release.
> Now, it means people *will* need to use revdep-rebuild as soon as they
> install their shiny new system if they use binary packages. People
> coming from stage3 would be fine, of course.
>
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 20:08 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > It's probably a bit late now (unless we want to wait yet another few
> > months), but tying this to a profile upgrade might have been a more
> > practical solution. 2007.0, or now 2007.1. Old profiles would stick
> > wi
On Tuesday, May 15, 2007 05:29:44 PM Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > but the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> > request form the KDE team as well, lately.
> You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not enough
> devs..
Rémi Cardona schrieb:
> The profile idea looks ideal.
Yup, +1 on that one
-Jokey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Duncan wrote:
> It's probably a bit late now (unless we want to wait yet another few
> months), but tying this to a profile upgrade might have been a more
> practical solution. 2007.0, or now 2007.1. Old profiles would stick
> with the old expat, and new ones would get the new one. People are
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Tue, 15 May 2007 07:30:17 -0400:
> I'd like to open a bug soon requesting the stabiliztion of
> dev-libs/expat-2.0.0*. It's currently assigned to tcltk, but the bug
> traffic seems to indicate they don't know why the
Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> but the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation
> request form the KDE team as well, lately.
You will get them tomorrow...promised. :) Too many bugs, not enough
devs...as always.
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http:/
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> > On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> >> * - This version has a new soname, so it will require a revdep-rebuild,
> >> which is probably why it hasn't been stabilized as of now.
> >
> > so add a call to preserve_old_lib
26 matches
Mail list logo
