Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags.
> > Anyone?
> +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start
> moving useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now.
> Once there are enough, let us move to
Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags.
> > > Anyone?
> > +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start
> > moving useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now.
> > Once there are enough, let us move
Hi,
> >
> > I don't think documentation using texinfo.tex (the documentation
> > that comes in .texi files) uses latex --- I believe that
> > texinfo.tex uses just plain tex.
actually you got a point; but let me show how the boundary is small:
take a texi file, process it with tex -> it works.
r
Am 07.11.2007 um 14:09 schrieb Ferris McCormick:
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:13 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Hi,
Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags.
Anyone?
+1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start
moving
useflags on a per package basis, mak
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:13 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. Anyone?
>
> +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start moving
> useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now. Once there
> are en
Hi,
> Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. Anyone?
+1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start moving
useflags on a per package basis, making them local for now. Once there
are enough, let us move to a global one. Once this is finished, let us
depreca
Hi!
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea
> > > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name
> > > > will
Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea
> > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name
> > > will speak by itself.
> > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and k
Hi!
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea useflag
> > would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name will speak by
> > itself.
>
> Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. Anyone?
As long as
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What are we going to do with the global tetex USE flag?
> > app-text/tetex is deprecated in favour of TeXLive which is still
> > hard masked but will be the default TeX distribution in the future.
> > Rename it to tex as TeXLive is based on teTeX? And what a
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> What are we going to do with the global tetex USE flag?
>> app-text/tetex is deprecated in favour of TeXLive which is still hard
>> masked but will be the default TeX distribution in the future.
>> Rename it to tex as TeXLive is based on teTeX? And what about
>> U
11 matches
Mail list logo
