Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea > > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name > > > will speak by itself. > > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. > > Anyone? > As long as the description of the USE flag (such as by euse -i) > is usefule (and *not* the equally omnipresentand useless "foo - > enables foo support"), I see no trouble in using it. > In this case I'd go for: > kpathsea - Enable (La)TeX integration.
Which I don't consider as correct: "enable integration with kpathsea search library (TeX related)" > IMHO, it'd better be "Support X11 DGA video output using the > vidix interface" Right, we have too many bad descriptions. Maybe a project for you to prepare a patch for use*.desc? :) V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
