Alec Warner posted on Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:53:03 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a license" in the
>> first place. It is possible to agree to a contract if there is
>> consideration on both sides and a meet
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> That doesn't mean you didn't / cannot accept, merely that some (all?)
> provisions are likely unenforceable in a court of law. I don't think
> EULAs have been ruled illegal yet.
I doubt that my proclamation that you aren't allowed to eat break
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Didn't the user already accept the license by putting it in ACCEPT_LICENSE?
>> If not, portage will not download it.
>>
>
> Well, I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a lice
On 2012.04.27 18:38, Rich Freeman wrote:
[snip]
> Do we as a matter of policy want to respect broken click-through
> download implementations?
>
> Rich
>
Yes we do.
Intent it what counts in the eyes of the law in most places.
Sites with broken click-throughs intend for them to be used.
--
We have had a talk about yEd on #gentoo-dev which is worth attaching
here:
<@ulm> aidecoe: I suspect that yEd is in violation of the GPL :/
<@ulm> their package zip file includes JavaHelp classes but no source code
for them
<@ulm> and I also don't see it at their site
<@ulm> neither do th
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Didn't the user already accept the license by putting it in ACCEPT_LICENSE?
> If not, portage will not download it.
>
Well, I'd argue that it is impossible to "accept a license" in the
first place. It is possible to agree to a contract
On 27/04/12 20:38, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
And this is probably the case when user has to accept a license on the
website. This is URL for zip archive of yEd-3.9.1:
http://www.yworks.com/en/products_download.php?file=yEd-3.9.1.zip
It
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>
> And this is probably the case when user has to accept a license on the
> website. This is URL for zip archive of yEd-3.9.1:
>
> http://www.yworks.com/en/products_download.php?file=yEd-3.9.1.zip
>
> It directs to website with license
> I'd like to add attached license to portage/licenses/. Any objections?
Because there seem to be no objection wrt license itself, I've just
committed it. I'll wait with adding ebuild until we get some consensus
wrt RESTRICT=fetch/mirror.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Excerpts from William Hubbs's message of 2012-04-27 16:34:05 +0200:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:26:07PM +, Duncan wrote:
> > Amadeusz Żołnowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:45:36 +0200 as
> > excerpted:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
> > >> No distribu
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tho FWIW I think restrict=fetch applies to stuff like cd/dvd-based game
> data as well, where the agreement is on the cd not a website, but still
> requires specific click-thru.
I think the real determiner should almost alway
William Hubbs posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:34:05 -0500 as excerpted:
> Restrict=fetch is used when a user has to go to a web site and register
> or accept a license on the web site before they download the file the
> way I understand it.
Thanks. I thought restrict=fetch was for when a website a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:26:07PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Amadeusz Żołnowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:45:36 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
> >> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
> >> correct?
> >
> > Wh
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
>> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
>> correct?
>
> Why RESTRICT=mirror? I'd put RESTRICT=fetch, actually.
>
I don't see much point in using
Amadeusz Żołnowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:45:36 +0200 as excerpted:
> Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
>> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
>> correct?
>
> Why RESTRICT=mirror? I'd put RESTRICT=fetch, actually.
That works. RES
Excerpts from Duncan's message of 2012-04-27 15:38:20 +0200:
> No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
> correct?
Why RESTRICT=mirror? I'd put RESTRICT=fetch, actually.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Amadeusz Żołnowski posted on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:30:32 +0200 as excerpted:
> This license would go to EULA group. Is this correct?
That appears to be correct to me, yes.
No distribution allowed. You're going to be doing restrict=mirror,
correct?
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTM
This license would go to EULA group. Is this correct?
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
18 matches
Mail list logo
