Peter Stuge posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:29:42 +0200 as excerpted:
> systemd isn't at all unstable in my experience, the only thing that it
> is lacking is experience among administrators.
FWIW, the "unstable" I was referring to wasn't necessarily crashing or
refusing to do its init job, but "d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/08/12 02:57 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Jason A. Donenfeld posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 06:33:02 +0200 as
> excerpted:
>
> Consider... five years ago was 2007. Android hadn't been released
> yet at this point in 2007 (November, according to the LWN 2007
Duncan wrote:
> given that a number of gentoo devs support larger installations of
> gentoo and aren't likely to be wanting to switch servers, etc, to
> systemd just because it's there
I think that once they've learned systemd, they will want to switch
those servers fast.
I use it on one sort-of
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:24:26 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:57:17 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> So I really expect people to be switching to systemd 2-3 years from
>> now, and that it'll be the gentoo default in 3-5 years, tho openrc will
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 06:57:17 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> So I really expect people to be switching to systemd 2-3 years from
> now, and that it'll be the gentoo default in 3-5 years, tho openrc
> will almost certainly be supported in /some/ form, at least
> comparable to the
Jason A. Donenfeld posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 06:33:02 +0200 as excerpted:
> Redhat is pushing systemd very hard [and] it seems like lots of
> everything are joining a fast-paced systemd stampede. [I] think the
> general perception is that without any set of policies to manage the
> stampede, syst
