On 07/01/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I guess, you are mixing cross-compile support in multilib profiles and
> cross-compile support with cross-toolchains, multilib-portage is for the
> first one, while crossdev is for the second one.
>
> My suggestion does not support e.g. compiling for
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:06:43 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> The problem here is the following: How do you know before the
> src_install phase, that a package has no ABI-specific content?
You make every package that has ABI specific content explicitly say so,
as metadata.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
sign
Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
>>> special-case packages that don't install binaries.
>>
>> I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags f
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:30:44 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > Zac Medico schrieb:
> >> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >>> Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau
> wrote:
> >
>
> I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/01/2012 05:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau
> wrote:
>> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having
>>> to special-case packages that don't install binaries.
>>
On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Zac Medico schrieb:
>> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> Matt Turner schrieb:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
packages
On 07/01/2012 02:52 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> Matt Turner schrieb:
I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
special-case packages that don't install binaries.
>>>
>
On 07/01/2012 02:34 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Zac Medico schrieb:
>> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>> Matt Turner schrieb:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
packages
On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
>>> special-case packages that don't install binaries.
>>
>> I dont follow. Did you think about only having
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
>> special-case packages that don't install binaries.
>
> I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for
> certain cases?
Right.
Zac Medico schrieb:
> On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
>>> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips
On 07/01/2012 04:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
>> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips.
>>
>>> If a package has de
Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
>>> packages and also because multilib is pretty importan
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
>> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips.
>>
>>> If a packa
Luca Barbato schrieb:
> On 06/29/2012 04:30 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> It is interesting, still you need a way to define HOST dependencies
> (stuff you need that has to be built on the host since you run it, e.g.
> xcb python code generator), something to play properly with ld and
> cross-vs-hos
Matt Turner schrieb:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>
>
> I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
> packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips.
>
>> If a package has dependencies, then those dependencies are required to
On 06/29/2012 04:30 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
It is interesting, still you need a way to define HOST dependencies
(stuff you need that has to be built on the host since you run it, e.g.
xcb python code generator), something to play properly with ld and
cross-vs-host paths for compilers (that part i
17 matches
Mail list logo
