Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-22 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 20:47 Mon 16 Mar     , Ryan Hill wrote: >> Whether it's enabled for EAPI 3 or not, I'd at least like to see 'test' >> added to FEATURES in targets/developer/make.defaults now.  That should >> (hopefully) raise the visibility somewhat. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 20:47 Mon 16 Mar , Ryan Hill wrote: > Whether it's enabled for EAPI 3 or not, I'd at least like to see 'test' > added to FEATURES in targets/developer/make.defaults now. That should > (hopefully) raise the visibility somewhat. I'm all for enabling it in the dev profile by default. -- Tha

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-11 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:20:39 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > All developers should enable it (a QA enforcement), but users by default > - no, NO. > There is more to a distribution than technical considerations. Yes, please, and can we do it now? I am frankly sick of failing testsuites and would r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-11 Thread James Rowe
* Marijn Schouten (hkBst) (hk...@gentoo.org) wrote: > James Rowe wrote: > > Package tests will have been run a -- possibly large -- number of > > times when users see them if they are rolled in to the EAPI bump. This > > isn't like the current situation of enabling tests and hoping somebody > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-11 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Rowe wrote: > * Christian Faulhammer (fa...@gentoo.org) wrote: >> Some years ago as a Gentoo beginner I read the documentation of >> FEATURES and enabled "test", because it sounded useful. After one week >> I disabled it again as merges took to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-10 Thread James Rowe
* Christian Faulhammer (fa...@gentoo.org) wrote: > Some years ago as a Gentoo beginner I read the documentation of > FEATURES and enabled "test", because it sounded useful. After one week > I disabled it again as merges took too long and some failures occured. > Read: As a normal user I don't wan

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-10 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh : > On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:12:02 +0300 > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > It is quite irresponsible to enable that by default for the FULL > > user base, given the state of the tree in regards to it > > Which is why we are not talking about enabling it for the tree. We are > talking

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:47:17 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 Updated draft: * S to WORKDIR fallback conditional for EAPI 3 * EAPI 3 has unpack --if-compressed, new src_unpack * Formatting: -- should be -{}- for econf things * RDEPEND=DEPEND gone in EA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Luca Barbato
Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100 Tiziano Müller wrote: * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless state? Yes, I'd like to see it enable by default as well, but we have to discuss that further. So, not suited for a fast eapi release. Please fix all 'p

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:54:02 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:51:00 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100 > > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless > > > > state? > > > Yes, I'd like to see i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:51:00 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless > > > state? > > Yes, I'd like to see it enable by default as well, but we have to > > discuss that further. So,

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100 Tiziano Müller wrote: > > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless > > state? > Yes, I'd like to see it enable by default as well, but we have to > discuss that further. So, not suited for a fast eapi release. Please fix all 'pkg fails t