Le mardi 28 janvier 2014 à 13:11 +, Steven J. Long a écrit :
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to change the
> > behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new EAPI. If an ebuild
> > needs to define EAPI=eapi-next to 'correctly' use
Alec Warner wrote:
> Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to change the
> behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new EAPI. If an ebuild
> needs to define EAPI=eapi-next to 'correctly' use XDG_*, well that is
> someone else's can of worms.
Agreed: portage can
