Le mardi 28 janvier 2014 à 13:11 +0000, Steven J. Long a écrit : > Alec Warner wrote: > > Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to change the > > behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new EAPI. If an ebuild > > needs to define EAPI=eapi-next to 'correctly' use XDG_*, well that is > > someone else's can of worms. > > Agreed: portage can clear those vars from the env as mgorny stated on the bug, > and an xdg.eclass (or w/e) can setup good defaults for packages which need > them. Presumably it'd be inherited by gnome and kde eclasses, for example, > so most people wouldn't even see it.
Exactly. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <e...@gentoo.org> Gentoo
