Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2010-01-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 26 December 2009 08:15:22 Thomas Sachau wrote: > On 12/26/2009 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > This is about what I understood. Now here I have some questions that > > may or may not be relevant. > > > > What triggers a multilib build? Is it unconditional, or can it be > > turned

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2010-01-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote: > On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a > >> thread at gentoo-dev ML: > >> > >> agenda topic: Di

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/26/2009 05:15 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > On 12/26/2009 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 25-12-2009 15:00:36 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Did you actually read my lines? I did NOT request an ACK to add it to >>> PMS and next EAPI with a complete spec. zmedico also has no problem >>> wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-26 Thread Thomas Sachau
On 12/26/2009 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On 25-12-2009 15:00:36 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >>> Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the >>> council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi Thomas, On 25-12-2009 15:00:36 +0100, Thomas Sachau wrote: > On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the > > council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project wasn't > > mature enough to go ahead. Also more gener

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-25 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a >>> thread at gentoo-dev ML: >>> >>> agenda topic: Discussi

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-25 Thread Thomas Sachau
On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a >> thread at gentoo-dev ML: >> >> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item: >> >> Adding real multilib

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-24 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a > thread at gentoo-dev ML: > > agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item: > > Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-12-2009 06:30:23 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: > On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to > > -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o > > would also have the original "January 2010 mee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the thread on -dev. Or you could just subs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-12-2009 22:16:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > gmane is f-ed up already irregardless of what we do. it eats cross-posted e- > mails for breakfast and doesnt tell anyone. > > as for archives.g.o, file a bug if it isnt handling threading within a list > properly. i dont really see how your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 20 December 2009 15:04:12 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 20-12-2009 15:01:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > > > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-12-2009 15:01:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare > > > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare > > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply > > to this thread. You'll get a second

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Fabian Groffen wrote: On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder approximately

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply > to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder > approximately two weeks before

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Thomas Sachau
On 12/15/2009 05:54 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > The next meeting will be on 18 January 2010 at 1900UTC. The date was > pushed back 2 weeks for various reasons but the main one is to let our > livers recover. Which prompts me to make the following public > announcement: Happy holidays! :o) > > I wi