On 02-02-2010 11:18:32 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> > # Prefix compat
> > case ${EAPI:-0} in
> > 0|1|2)
> > if ! use prefix; then
> > EPREFIX=
> > ED=${D}
> > EROOT=${ROOT}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 2.2.2010 11:18, Torsten Veller napsal(a):
> * Tomáš Chvátal :
>> # @FUNCTION: font_pkg_setup
>> # @DESCRIPTION:
>> # The font pkg_setup function.
>> # Collision portection and Prefix compat for eapi < 3.
>> font_pkg_setup() {
>> # make sure we
* Tomáš Chvátal :
> # @FUNCTION: font_pkg_setup
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # The font pkg_setup function.
> # Collision portection and Prefix compat for eapi < 3.
> font_pkg_setup() {
> # make sure we get no collisions
> # setup is not the nicest place, but preinst doesn't cut it
> [[ -e
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:29:19 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 1.2.2010 14:14, Peter Volkov napsal(a):
> > 1.
> > -FONT_SUFFIX=${FONT_SUFFIX:-}
> > +: ${FONT_SUFFIX:=}
> >
> > What are the benefits of this change? Personally I prefer first syntax
> > more since it's more evident and does not need
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 14:29 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет:
> > 2.
> > if has X ${IUSE//+} && use X ; then
> >
> > I'm not sure. With this change should we update all packages depending
> > on font.eclass to have X in IUSE?
> Nak this specialy allows that you dont have to keep X in iuse.
> But it does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 1.2.2010 14:14, Peter Volkov napsal(a):
> В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 11:35 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет:
>> As I was reworking the x-modular-r2 eclass I found out that most of the
>> slowdowns for fonts were produced in fonts eclass.
>
> Exactly what slowd
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 11:35 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет:
> As I was reworking the x-modular-r2 eclass I found out that most of the
> slowdowns for fonts were produced in fonts eclass.
Exactly what slowdowns are you talking about? I've reviewed all changes
and I don't see any noticeable performance im
