Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Jan Kundrát
Flameeyes, blubb, dostrow - what about publishing your recent blog entries as the official news from your projects? WKR, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Jan Kundrát
Patrick Lauer wrote: > So - as GWN monkey - I'm offering my services as aggregator for project > updates. I'd rather see the project managers/bosses/dedicated_members doing that themselves. Fine example might be GDP updates which work quite well, IMHO. > Maybe someone from the doc project wants t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Lares Moreau
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:00 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Hi all, > > as the debate about the future direction of Gentoo continues it's > getting more and more obvious to me that there's a lack of information > skewing the debate. It seems that while most devs (and users) have a > good idea what's

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: | Funny enough... I was working on this and forgot to send it out. | | I was planning on posting it also on the Release Engineering page, but | need to turn it into GuideXML first. Might want to run it through spellcheck first

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:00 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So - as GWN monkey - I'm offering my services as aggregator for project > updates. Maybe someone from the doc project wants to help to get this > information put on the website so that it's visible? Funny enough... I was working on this and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:41 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a > | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the > | portage sources that say to f

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Grobian
On 05-01-2006 16:41:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a > | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the > | portage sources that say to fix/im

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the | portage sources that say to fix/implement X, a discussion on project | ML Y working on Z. Woul

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Grobian
On 05-01-2006 17:00:15 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > So - as GWN monkey - I'm offering my services as aggregator for project > updates. Maybe someone from the doc project wants to help to get this > information put on the website so that it's visible? The following crossed my mind: what about a De

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Stuart Herbert
Hi Patrick, On 1/5/06, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I suggest project updates every 6 months (which roughly is the sametimeframe as releases)Maybe this helps people get a "global vision" of where Gentoo is and where it's going.   Didn't the new metastructure place requirements on projec

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Alec Joseph Warner
Patrick Lauer wrote: Hi all, as the debate about the future direction of Gentoo continues it's getting more and more obvious to me that there's a lack of information skewing the debate. It seems that while most devs (and users) have a good idea what's happening in "their" projects it's quite d

[gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates

2006-01-05 Thread Patrick Lauer
Hi all, as the debate about the future direction of Gentoo continues it's getting more and more obvious to me that there's a lack of information skewing the debate. It seems that while most devs (and users) have a good idea what's happening in "their" projects it's quite difficult to see what is h